Wheat growing in a field.
Environment & Natural Resources

Production of specialty small grains in Ohio

Small grains are commonly used as a forage or cover crop, but grain can be used as animal feed or within food or drink products.

ANR-0154

In Ohio, soft red winter wheat is the predominantly produced small grain, with 530,000 acres planted in fall 2024 (USDA-NASS, 2024). Soft red winter wheat is commonly used for sponge cakes, cookies, crackers, and other confectionary products (U.S. Wheat Associates, 2023). Although soft red winter wheat is commonly produced by farmers in Ohio, there is interest in other classes of wheat or other small grains due to local demand and niche markets (Table 1).

In the United States, wheat is divided into six classes based on bran color (red or white), protein content (hard = high protein, soft = low protein), and growth habit (winter or spring), which influence end-use (Table 1). Ancient wheats, such as spelt, einkorn, and emmer, have been minimally changed by breeding efforts and are marketed by health food industries. Ancient wheat yields are often lower than modern wheat varieties, and grain often requires dehulling after harvest (Thapa et al., 2023); however, low fertilizer requirements and high consumer demand may offset challenges associated with ancient wheat production (Cadeddu et al., 2021). Other small grains, such as barley, oat, rye, and triticale, are commonly used as a forage or cover crop, but grain can be used as animal feed or within food or drink products.

Table 1. Small grains, primary production areas within the United States, and common end-uses.

Small grains

Primary production area

End-use

U.S. wheat classes

Soft red winter wheat

Eastern portion of the United States, including Ohio

Sponge cakes, cookies, crackers, and other confectionary products

Soft white wheat

Pacific Northwest with small acreage in Michigan

Sponge cakes and Asian noodles

Hard red winter wheat

Great Plains, Pacific Northwest, and California

Pan breads, hard rolls, croissants, and flat breads

Hard white wheat

Central Plains (Nebraska, Kansas, Colorado) and California

Asian noodles, pan breads, and flat breads

Hard red spring wheat

North Central Region (North Dakota, South Dakota, Montana)

Bagels, artisan breads, pizza crust, and other strong dough products

Durum

North Dakota with smaller acreage in Montana and California

Pasta, couscous, and some Mediterranean breads

Ancient wheats

Spelt, einkorn, and emmer

Scattered production in North Central Region and Eastern U.S.

Flour, health food products

Other Small Grains

Barley

Central Plains and Pacific Northwest

Animal feed, malt products, cereals, soups

Triticale

Scattered production in Pacific Northwest, Midwest, and South

Animal feed, health food market

Rye

Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, North Dakota

Animal feed, flour, alcoholic products

Oat

Central Plains, North Central Region (North Dakota, South Dakota), Texas, and Wisconsin

Animal feed, rolled oats, oat flour

A three-year experiment (2020–2021, 2021–2022, and 2022–2023) was established at the Northwest Agricultural Research Station in Wood County, Ohio, to compare soft red winter wheat yield with specialty small grain yield. Winter small grains were planted within two to 11 days of the county Hessian fly-free date of September 23 and harvested in July (Table 2). Spring small grains were planted in April and harvested in late July or early August. For all years, soybean was the previous crop and small grains were planted in row widths of 7.5-inches. The seeding rate varied by small grain type. Soft red winter wheat, soft white winter wheat, hard red winter wheat, hard white winter wheat, hard red spring wheat, and durum were seeded at 1.75 million seeds per acre. Spelt, winter and spring barley, triticale, and oat were seeded at 1.5 million seeds per acre. Winter rye for feed, einkorn, and emmer were seeded at 1 million seeds per acre while hybrid winter rye was seeded at 0.8 million seeds per acre.

The entire field area received minimum tillage each fall prior to planting. Nitrogen (N) fertilizer, ranging from 27 to 33 pounds (lb) per acre, was applied to the entire field area in the fall. Each spring, an additional 90 lb of N per acre was applied to the winter small grains (late March to mid-April) and spring small grains (mid-May to early June). The entire field had lime, phosphorus, and potassium applied as needed to maintain soil test levels appropriate for winter wheat production.

Table 2. Planting and harvesting dates for winter and spring small grains planted at the Northwest Agricultural Research Station in Wood County, Ohio.

Year

Winter small grains

Winter small grains

Spring small grains

Spring small grains

 

Planting date

Harvesting date

Planting date

Harvesting date

1

Sept 25, 2020

July 22, 2021

April 5, 2021

July 22, 2021

2

Oct 2, 2021

July 11, 2021

April 20, 2021

Aug 4, 2021

3

Oct 4, 2022

July 10, 2023

April 13, 2023

Aug 2, 2023

Winter small grains

Across the three-year experiment, the standard small grain for Ohio, soft red winter wheat had the highest yield, averaging 93 bushels (bu) per acre (Figure 1). Soft white winter wheat, hard red winter wheat, and hard white winter wheat grain yield was slightly lower, averaging 87, 81, and 85 bu per acre, respectively. The fall-planted ancient wheat (spelt) yielded an average of 47 bu per acre. Winter malting barley had an average yield of 82 bushels per acre and triticale had an average yield of 80 bu per acre. Hybrid winter rye yielded an average of 71 bu per acre while winter rye for feed yielded 59 bu per acre. The yield of all varieties of winter small grains is shown in Table 3.

Graphic showing the grain yield of a variety of winter and spring small grains.
Figure 1. Grain yield of winter and spring small grains. The shaded box shows the inter-quartile range, representing the middle 50% of the value. The solid line within each shaded box represents the median value. The upper and lower whiskers represent the maximum and minimum value, respectively. Graphic by Laura Lindsey, The Ohio State University.

Spring small grains

Hard red spring wheat and durum wheat yielded much lower than fall-planted wheat, averaging 39 and 35 bu per acre, respectively (Figure 1). The two spring-planted ancient wheats, einkorn and emmer, yielded even lower at 13 and 17 bu per acre, respectively. Spring barley for feed yielded an average of 51 bu per acre, and spring barley for malt yielded an average of 60 bu per acre. Of the spring small grains, oat had the largest yield at an average of 73 bu per acre; however, yields were extremely variable depending on the year and variety (Table 4).

Overall, spring small grains tended to have lower yields than the winter small grains. This is likely due to the shorter grain-fill period associated with spring small grains compared to winter small grains. Furthermore, spring-planted small grains are extremely sensitive to planting date. Spring-planted small grains yielded the highest amount in 2021 and 2023 when they were planted on April 5 and April 13, respectively. In 2022, the spring small grains were planted on April 20 due to wet weather, which resulted in lower grain yields (Table 5).

Other considerations

Although grain yield is an important parameter, there are several other important factors that need to be considered before producing specialty small grains.

Contracts or other agreements
Specialty small grains are not sold through traditional grain elevators that sell corn, soybean, and wheat, so a contract or other agreement should be in place before planting.

Grain quality parameters
Depending on the end-use, certain grain-quality parameters may need to be met. For example, hard red winter wheat should have a medium to high protein content of 10% to 13% (U.S. Wheat Associates, 2023). However, in an Ohio environment, protein content may be lower. In addition to protein, other quality parameters of test weight, grain plumpness, germination, and deoxynivalenol concentration may be important depending on end-use.

Agronomic best management practices
In Ohio, most small grain agronomic best management practices are based on soft red winter wheat. Guidelines are available for producing winter malting barley in Ohio (Lindsey et al., 2020), but are limited for other specialty small grains. Agronomic management of specialty small grains in Ohio is an area of research that needs to be further explored.

Table 3. Grain yield of winter small grains. Different letters within a small grain type and year indicate a statistically significant difference in grain yield at 95% confidence.

Type

Brand

Variety

2021 Yield (bushels per acre)

2022 Yield (bushels per acre)

2023 Yield (bushels per acre)

Soft Red Winter Wheat

Pioneer

25R74

103.4 AB

71.0 A

101.1 A

Soft Red Winter Wheat

Dyna-Gro

DY 9862

94.7 DC

71.2 A

102.1 A

Soft Red Winter Wheat

FS Wheat

FS 603

92.3 DC

66.0 A

108.0 A

Soft Red Winter Wheat

MI Crop Imp. Assoc.

Harpoon

91.1 D

69.3 A

103.0 A

Soft Red Winter Wheat

Jung

Jung 5195

97.3 BCD

80.4 A

106.7 A

Soft Red Winter Wheat

Jung

Jung 5888

96.4 DC

77.4 A

107.2 A

Soft Red Winter Wheat

Legacy

LW 2023

104.7 A

75.4 A

108.2 A

Soft Red Winter Wheat

AgriPro

SY Viper

98.9 ABC

61.2 A

109.6 A

Soft White Winter Wheat

Dyna-Gro

9242W

96.3 A

60.4 A

102.1 A

Soft White Winter Wheat

MI Crop Imp. Assoc

Jupiter

94.7 A

40.6 A

101.1 BC

Soft White Winter Wheat

KWS

KWS 317

95.6 A

73.1 A

114.0 A

Soft White Winter Wheat

MI Crop Imp. Assoc

MI 14W019

88.9 AB

71.7 A

not tested

Soft White Winter Wheat

MI Crop Imp. Assoc

MI 16W013

not tested

not tested

97.9 BC

Soft White Winter Wheat

MI Crop Imp. Assoc

MI 16W052

93.5 A

73.6 A

95.9 BC

Soft White Winter Wheat

MI Crop Imp. Assoc

Moonlight

81.7 B

68.4 A

100.2 BC

Soft White Winter Wheat

MI Crop Imp. Assoc

Whitetail

88.8 AB

63.4 A

93.8 BC

Hard Red Winter Wheat

OK Foundation Seed

Bakers Anne

78.9 E

46.7 BC

94.9 BCD

Hard Red Winter Wheat

OK Foundation Seed

Double Stop CL Plus

79.0 E

58.0 ABC

95.7 BC

Hard Red Winter Wheat

SD Ag. Exp. Station

Expedition

86.1 B

71.9 A

91.9 BCD

Hard Red Winter Wheat

OK Foundation Seed

Green Hammer

79.4 ED

48.8 BC

90.7 CD

Hard Red Winter Wheat

OK Foundation Seed

Showdown

97.8 A

69.7 A

109.5 A

Hard Red Winter Wheat

OK Foundation Seed

Skydance

84.3 CD

43.1 C

87.9 D

Hard Red Winter Wheat

OK Foundation Seed

Smiths Gold

not tested

60.8 AB

96.4 BC

Hard Red Winter Wheat

AgriPro

SY Wolf

90.0 B

58.5 AB

98.4 B

Hard White Winter Wheat

Colorado State

Breck

86.4 BC

62.2 A

101.9 A

Hard White Winter Wheat

KS Wheat Assoc/Kansas State

Joe

86.0 BC

68.8 A

104.8 A

Hard White Winter Wheat

KS Wheat Assoc/Kansas State

KS Silverado

86.8 BC

55.5 A

106.0 A

Hard White Winter Wheat

Colorado State

Monarch

83.5 C

64.9 A

103.2 A

Hard White Winter Wheat

OK Foundation Seed

OCW04S71T-6W

90.7 AB

69.0 A

102.4 A

Hard White Winter Wheat

OK Foundation Seed

OK 12716W

90.3 AB

66.6 A

98.3 A

Hard White Winter Wheat

Colorado State

Snowmass 2.0

95.3 A

73.2 A

102.3 A

Hard White Winter Wheat

Colorado State

Thunder CL

73.2 D

54.3 A

102.4 A

Spelt

Ohio Seed Imp. Assoc.

Comet

32.3 A

38.0 A

68.6 A

Spelt

Ohio Seed Imp. Assoc.

Sabre

22.7 A

47.1 A

70.1 A

Spelt

Ohio Seed Imp. Assoc.

Sungold

25.7 A

54.2 A

81.4 A

Winter Malting Barley

Virginia Tech

Avalon

99.9 AB

50.1 A

75.1 BC

Winter Malting Barley

Ackermann

Flavia

108.8 A

not tested

not tested

Winter Malting Barley

Ackermann

Hirondella

105.2 A

67.2 A

99.6 A

Winter Malting Barley

Ackermann

Marouetta

not tested

47.3 A

92.7 AB

Winter Malting Barley

Virginia Tech

Thoroughbred

90.5 B

58.7 A

68.2 C

Winter Rye

Albert Lea

Danko

75.1 BC

53.7 A

70.7 B

Winter Rye

Albert Lea

Hazlet

77.4 BC

43.7 AB

74.0 B

Winter Rye

WI Crop Imp. Assoc.

Spooner

69.7 C

14.7 C

48.8 C

Winter Rye

KWS

Bono (hybrid)

98.3 A

64.5 A

98.1 A

Winter Rye

KWS

Propower (hybrid)

78.2 BC

57.3 A

88.2 A

Winter Rye

KWS

Serafino (hybrid)

83.5 B

29.0 BC

39.6 C

Triticale

TriCal

Gainer 15

100.0 A

46.9 A

105.9 A

Triticale

TriCal

Ace

94.0 B

not tested

not tested

Table 4. Grain yield of spring-planted small grains. Different letters within a small grain type and year indicate a statistically significant difference in grain yield at 95% confidence.

Type

Brand

Variety

2021 Yield (bushels per acre)

2022 Yield (bushels per acre)

2023 Yield (bushels per acre)

Hard Red Spring Wheat

CROPLAN

CP3530

55.4 A

21.7 A

55.1 A

Hard Red Spring Wheat

Montana State

Dagmar

40.7 B

10.8 A

40.8 EF

Hard Red Spring Wheat

Univ of Minnesota

MN Torgy

52.8 A

22.3 A

47.5 DC

Hard Red Spring Wheat

North Dakota St Univ

ND Frohberg

55.9 A

19.5 A

50.2 BC

Hard Red Spring Wheat

North Dakota St Univ

ND VitPRO

51.9 A

16.0 A

45.1 DE

Hard Red Spring Wheat

Syngenta

SY Valda

54.4 A

15.1 A

50.6 BC

Hard Red Spring Wheat

Montana State

Vida

51.5 A

22.6 A

40.7 F

Hard Red Spring Wheat

WestBred

WB 9590

Not tested

Not tested

52.0 AB

Durum

WestBred

Alzada

23.8 D

15.6 A

36.4 C

Durum

ND State Univ.

Divide

43.9 C

23.1 A

43.4 AB

Durum

ND State Univ.

Joppa

46.6 BC

21.5 A

39.9 BC

Durum

Montana State

Lustre

52.3 AB

24.7 A

39.3 BC

Durum

ND Ag Exp Station

ND Gano

47.4 ABC

14.4 A

43.4 AB

Durum

ND Ag Exp Station

ND Riveland

54.4 A

21.5 A

45.0 A

Durum

TCG

TCG Bright

45.1 BC

16.0 A

42.0 AB

Einkorn

Azure Standard

Azure

Not tested

10.1

15.1

Emmer

Albert Lea

Lucille

20.2

7.4

21.3

Spring Barley-Feed

WI Foundation Seeds

Kewaunee

65.6 A

18.4 A

68.6 A

Spring Barley-Feed

Albert Lea

Quest

65.6 A

14.7 A

66.0 A

Spring Barley-Feed

Albert Lea

Robust

66.3 A

14.7 A

71.7 A

Spring BarleyMalt

Albert Lea

Fantex

61.1 B

12.1 B

73.0 A

Spring BarleyMalt

Albert Lea

ND Genesis

87.1 A

20.7 A

85.0 A

Spring BarleyMalt

ND Crop Improvement Assoc.

Tradition

79.9 A

20.4 A

81.9 A

Oat

WI Foundation Seeds

Antigo

Not tested

35.4 A

96.7 C

Oat

WI Foundation Seeds

Badger

Not tested

43.6 A

113.8 B

Oat

WI Foundation Seeds

BetaGene

Not tested

26.8 A

95.2 C

Oat

WI Foundation Seeds

Esker

Not tested

36.2 A

120.5 AB

Oat

WI Foundation Seeds

Forage Plus

Not tested

20.1 A

130.5 A

Oat

WI Foundation Seeds

Laker

Not tested

30.6 A

124.2 AB

Acknowledgments

This experiment was conducted in Ohio as part of a larger study initiated and directed by Dr. Shawn Conley and Dr. Haleigh Ortmeier-Clarke at the University of Wisconsin-Madison. Special thanks go to Matt Davis and Matt Hankinson for establishing and managing the experiment in Ohio.

References

Cadeddu, F., Motzo, R., Mureddu, F., & Giunta, F. (2021). Ancient wheat species are suitable to grain-only and grain plus herbage utilisations in marginal Mediterranean environments. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 41(15).
doi:10.1007/s13593-021-00670-7

Lindsey, L., Shrestha, R., McGlinch, G., Culman, S., Loux, M., Paul, P., & Stockinger, E. (2020). Management of Ohio winter malting barley [PDF]. Retrieved from
stepupsoy.osu.edu/sites/hcs-soy/files/Malting%20Barley%20Handout-%20Spring%202020.pdf

Thapa, R.K., Eberle, C., and Youngquist, C. (2023). Ancient spring wheat production in Wyoming. Crop, Forage & Turfgrass Management, 9.
DOI:10.1002/cft2.20237

United States Department of Agriculture National Agricultural Statistics Service (USDA-NASS). (2024). Quick stats tools [Webpage]. Retrieved from
quickstats.nass.usda.gov/results/3BA3C0D7-24AE-36BD-A06F-2C39A833B3B9

U.S. Wheat Associates. (2023). U.S. soft red winter crop quality data highlights [Webpage]. Retrieved from
uswheat.org/crop-quality/soft-red-winter

Written by Laura Lindsey, Professor, Horticulture and Crop Science, The Ohio State University.